Search Results for "Central Government Authority"

7246 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7246 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Creates Estoppel Against Challenging the Scheme Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Without Timely Challenge Estops Employee from Alleging Coercion Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Answers Reference on Entitlement of Second Wife to Family Pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court examines Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in light of Hindu Marriage Act and personal laws.

The matter came before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a Division Bench to resolve the question whether the second wife of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2393 OF 2017

...