Search Results for "Capital Investment"

756 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 756 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL No. 331 of 2012

The dispute centered on the shareholding of Gharda Chemicals Ltd., a closely held company originally belonging to the Gharda and Kavasmaneck families....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement — Upholds Arbitral Award Restored by Earlier Judgment. Court Holds That Curative Jurisdiction Under Article 142 Is Not Available to Re-Argue Merits Where No Miscarriage of Justice Is Shown.

The Supreme Court dismissed a curative petition filed by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) against its earlier judgment in Delhi Airport Metro Expre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Prior Recording of Reasons. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Reasons Not Recorded Before Issuance of Notice.

The petitioner, M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08, which was revised and subsequently ...