Search Results for "workmen status"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "workmen status"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Management in Industrial Dispute Over Fraudulent Appointments Under Employment Exchange Act. Termination of 38 workmen justified as their names were absent from Employment Exchange sponsored lists and they took contradictory stands on appointment legitimacy, violating statutory recruitment obligations under Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of 38 workmen by the Management of Bhalgora Area of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), a Central Government und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Workmen Termination Dispute. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Between Firm and Workmen Despite Contractor Engagement.

22 Nov 2018

The petitioner, a partner of M/s. Shah & Co., challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai in Reference (IT) No.24 of 2011. The dispute co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Preliminary Issue. Management's Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Approval of Dismissal Was Pending; Tribunal Erred in Holding Domestic Enquiry Vitiated Without Adjudicating the Application.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. (KFIL), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Remedy Under Industrial Disputes Act Is Available to Non-Teaching Staff of Private School in View of Exclusive Remedy Under MEPS Act. Labour Court Had Dismissed References as Not Maintainable Citing Adarsh Shikshan Sanstha and St. Ulai High School Decisions.

9 Dec 2016

Two writ petitions were filed by non-teaching staff of a private school challenging Labour Court awards that dismissed their references under the Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Relief Order in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Without Prejudging Merits. Industrial Court's Order Granting Rs.3,500 Per Month to Workmen Set Aside for Lack of Consideration of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Under Section 10(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), challenged an order dated 15/04/2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Akola Bench, in Reference (BIR) No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act. Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Industrial Court Can Assume Jurisdiction.

26 Jul 2006

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Industrial Court which had dismissed its a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

11 Jul 2005

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Management in Industrial Dispute Over Jurisdiction of Tribunal to Determine Existence of Strikes Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Held that the Tribunal cannot go beyond the terms of reference which assumed the existence of strikes and lock-out, and must confine itself to deciding legality and justification.

14 Oct 1966

The case involved industrial disputes between the management of Delhi Cloth Mills and Swatantra Bharat Mills (two units of Delhi Cloth & General Mills...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)