Search Results for "warehouse removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "warehouse removal"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in PMC Compound Wall Demolition Case — Construction Prior to Inclusion in Municipal Limits Not Subject to Section 478 Notice. Notice under Section 478 of BPMC Act, 1949 cannot be issued for a wall constructed before property came within municipal limits; alternatively, such notice cannot be construed as one under Section 260.

19 Oct 2011

The appellant, Ninad Sah. Gruharachana Sanstha Mydt., owned a property in Pune. In 1969, before the property was included within the limits of the Pun...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Cross-Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Award Modifying Dismissal of Security Guard for Negligence and Insubordination to Lesser Punishment; Reinstatement Ordered with 25% Backwages. The Labour Court Set Aside Dismissal Under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Holding That Punishment Was Disproportionate, and Both Parties Challenged the Award.

5 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from two connected writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka: one filed by the workman (W.P.No.52668/2014) and the other by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Property Tax Demands on Mobile Towers in Part. Conservancy Tax, Penalty, and Shasti on Illegal Constructions Quashed as Invalid Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act.

18 Apr 2017

The petitioners, Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. and another, carry on business of providing infrastructure services including installation and ma...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Rectification Petition Filed by Le Shark Apparel Limited Seeking Cancellation of Respondents' Registered Trade Mark No. 466002 in Class 25. Petition Based on Grounds of Non-Use Under Section 47 and Fraudulent Registration Under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Le Shark Apparel Limited, filed a Commercial Miscellaneous Petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking rectification of the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

4 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Dealer for Obstructing Sales Tax Inspector During Inspection Under MP General Sales Tax Act. Forcible Taking of Account Books for Temporary Inspection Not Seizure; Distinction Between Inspection and Seizure Under Sections 29(2) and 29(3) Clarified.

1 Sep 1969

The dispute arose from a surprise inspection at the shop of appellant Mangat Rai, a dealer under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. A Sal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

24 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

14 Mar 2019

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)