Search Results for "unsatisfactory explanation"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Withdrawal of School Recognition for Tribal Students — Violation of Natural Justice. Impugned order quashed for lack of opportunity of hearing under Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009.

The petitioners, two educational trusts and their respective schools, challenged an order dated 4 September 2025 passed by the Under-Secretary, Tribal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition for Inordinate Delay of 794 Days — Condonation Refused Due to Unsatisfactory Explanation. Delay of 794 days in filing review petition not condoned as explanation was unsatisfactory, leading to dismissal on limitation grounds.

The State of Gujarat and another petitioner filed a review petition before the Supreme Court against an order in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 33...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes License Suspension in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Procedural Violation in Inspection and Appeal. Failure to Provide Inspection Report and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Suspension Order Unsustainable Under Rule 66(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

The petitioner, M/s. Raj Pharma, a partnership firm holding a valid drug license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945, challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Strangulation Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abbas Nawaj Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his daughter Heena by strangulation. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Supplied.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Kirti Vanabhai Patel, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detentio...