Bombay High Court Quashes Withdrawal of School Recognition for Tribal Students Under GR Dated 28 August 2009 — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. The impugned order was set aside for being passed without show cause notice and without assigning any reasons, violating principles of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, two educational trusts and their respective schools, challenged an order dated 4 September 2025 passed by the Under-Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Government of Maharashtra. The order withdrew the recognition and affiliation granted to the petitioners' schools for admitting tribal students under Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009, and directed transfer and absorption of tribal students to other schools. The petitioners contended that the order was passed without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, and was cryptic and non-speaking. The court observed that the impugned order did not disclose any reasons for withdrawal and was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The court held that the order was arbitrary and unsustainable. Accordingly, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to restore the recognition and affiliation of the petitioners' schools. The court also directed that the tribal students already transferred may continue in their new schools if they so desire, but the petitioners' schools are entitled to admit new tribal students as per the GR. The petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Speaking Order - Withdrawal of Recognition - Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009 - The impugned order withdrawing recognition and affiliation of schools for tribal students was passed without issuing any show cause notice or affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, and the order was cryptic and non-speaking. Held that such an order violates principles of natural justice and must be set aside (Paras 5-8).

B) Education Law - Recognition of Schools - Tribal Students - Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009 - The petitioners' schools were granted recognition and affiliation under the said GR for admitting tribal students. The impugned order withdrew such recognition without assigning any reasons or basis. Held that the order is arbitrary and unsustainable (Paras 3-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 4 September 2025 withdrawing recognition and affiliation granted to the petitioners' schools for admitting tribal students under Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009 is legal, valid, and proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 4 September 2025. Directed the respondents to restore the recognition and affiliation of the petitioners' schools for admitting tribal students under Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009. Directed that tribal students already transferred may continue in their new schools if they so desire, but the petitioners' schools are entitled to admit new tribal students as per the GR. Petitions allowed with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • speaking order
  • withdrawal of recognition
  • tribal students
  • Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977
  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act
  • 2009
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 255

Writ Petition No.11384 of 2025 and Writ Petition No.11677 of 2025

2025-10-09

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Hiten S. Venegavkar

2025:BHC-AUG:29883-DB

Mr. V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents - State

Sulochana Belekar Samajik Va Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. (in WP 11384/2025); Vishwatmak Jangli Maharaj Ashram Trust & Anr. (in WP 11677/2025)

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the withdrawal of recognition and affiliation granted to schools for admitting tribal students under Government Resolution dated 28 August 2009.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the order dated 4 September 2025 and restoration of recognition and affiliation.

Filing Reason

The impugned order was passed without show cause notice or opportunity of hearing and was cryptic and non-speaking.

Issues

Whether the impugned order dated 4 September 2025 withdrawing recognition and affiliation of the petitioners' schools is legal and valid? Whether the impugned order violates principles of natural justice for want of show cause notice and opportunity of hearing? Whether the impugned order is a speaking order?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the impugned order was passed without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, and is cryptic and non-speaking. Respondents argued that the order was passed in the interest of tribal students and was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

An order withdrawing recognition and affiliation must be preceded by a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing, and must be a speaking order. Failure to do so renders the order arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order does not disclose any reasons for withdrawal of recognition and affiliation. The order was passed without issuing any show cause notice or affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The impugned order is cryptic and non-speaking.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the order dated 4 September 2025 passed by the Under-Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Government of Maharashtra. The petitions were heard together and disposed of by a common judgment on 9 October 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of an 85-Year-Old Fruit Vendor, Condoning Delay in Filing Review Petition Due to Old Age and Illness. The Court Held That Sufficient Cause Was Shown Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and Dir...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Under Section 37 Against Order Quashing Arbitral Award on Limitation. Single Judge's order set aside arbitral award as claim was found barred by limitation, limited to determination under Section 34 of ...