Search Results for "trademark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "trademark"

237 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 237 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

6 May 2020

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim in Trademark Dispute Over 'Buckaroo' and 'Walkaroo' Marks. Plaintiff's failure to establish goodwill and reputation in India for its mark 'Buckaroo' leads to denial of interim injunction against defendant's use of 'Walkaroo'.

30 Jan 2020

The plaintiff, Kinjal Ramesh Savla, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'Buckaroo' and related marks, as well...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting criminal prosecution under Sections 420, 34 IPC and Sections 27, 28, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court, at its Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking q...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3(a) CPC Renders Injunction Invalid. The court held that the trial court's order issuing suit summons and notice on I.A.No.3 after the plaintiff failed to comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3(a) CPC within 30 days was unsustainable.

6 Jan 2017

The respondent/plaintiff, Mavalli Tiffin Rooms, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the appellant/defendant, HMS Host Services India Pvt. Lt...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off of Identical Mark SPASGAN in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Plaintiff's Registered Trademark SPASGAN Entitled to Protection Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

28 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Wockhardt Limited, filed a suit against Eden Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. seeking to prevent infringement and passing off of its trademark SPAS...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, Fortune Alcobrew Pvt. Limited and Hindust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.

29 Apr 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)