Search Results for "trade test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "trade test"

1423 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1423 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Finds Industrial Court's Order Erroneous for Reading Unproved Consent Certificate Under Section 28(1A) of Trade Union Act. Failure to Prove Consent Certificate as Required by Section 28(1A) of Trade Union Act, 1926 Renders Industrial Court Proceeding Without Jurisdiction.

21 Dec 2010

The petitioner, Arun Asatkar, was a member of the Nagpur Union of Working Journalists since 1978 and worked at Lokmat newspaper. A dispute arose regar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

11 Aug 2016

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers interim injunction in passing-off suit over 'iTerm' mark for online insurance policies. Court examines whether 'iTerm' is inherently distinctive or has acquired secondary meaning under common law of passing off, and plaintiff's challenge to defendant's use of 'Aviva i-Term Smart'.

19 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Aegon Life Insurance Company Limited, instituted a suit for passing off against Aviva Life Insurance Company India Limited, seeking an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5001'. The court held that the Defendant's mark 'COX 5001' is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND', constituting infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and passing off under Section 135.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a commercial suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, Jagpin Brewerise Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

30 Jan 2015

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

9 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeals; Profits from Sale of Gold and Shares Held Capital Receipts Not Taxable as Income. Court Rules Transactions Were Realisation of Investment, Not Adventures in Nature of Trade, and High Court Erred in Treating Tribunal's Finding as Unreviewable Fact.

1 Sep 1969

The appeals arose from references under Section 66(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 concerning the assessee, a large landholder, who had inherited subst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

3 Sep 2024

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)