Search Results for "terrorist conspiracy"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to PFI Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Parity with Co-Accused. Appellant's Custody Since July 2022 Without Charge Framing Violates Article 21.

The appellant, Athar Parwez, was arrested on 12.07.2022 in connection with FIR No. 827/2022 registered at Police Station Phulwari Sharif, Patna, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in 2012 Pune Bomb Blasts Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Trial. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 of the Constitution Overrides Statutory Restrictions Under Section 43-D(5) of UAPA.

The appellant, Munib Iqbal Memon, was arrested on 26 December 2012 in connection with five bomb blasts that occurred in Pune on 1 August 2012. The bla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Bail Granted to Accused in NIA Terror Case — No Prima Facie Case for Detention Under UAP Act. Court upholds High Court's finding that the accused's name did not appear in FIR or witness statements, and bail conditions were not violated.

The Union of India appealed against the High Court of Jharkhand's order granting bail to the respondent in a case investigated by the National Investi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...