Search Results for "temporary promotion"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Medical Faculty Promotion Dispute — Interference with Executive Order Held Unwarranted. High Court erred in reading 'after acquiring postgraduate degree' into experience criteria for teaching posts where the Government Order did not contain such requirement.

The case involves a dispute over the promotion of Dr. Sharmad to the post of Associate Professor in the Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Education ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order Reinstating Part-Time Teacher in Retrenchment Case Under MEPS Act. Rule 26 of MEPS Rules Requires Compliance with Retrenchment Protections Including Notice, Seniority, Prior Approval, and Absorption.

The petitioners, Nagpur Shikshan Mandal and Smt. Binzani Mahila Mahavidyalaya, challenged the judgment and order dated 14-8-2013 of the School Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotions of Junior Engineers to Deputy Engineers in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Petitioners failed to establish that the promotion policy violated statutory rules or that the seniority list was arbitrary.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging the promotion of Junior Engineers to De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Promotions of Assistant Engineers. Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without MPSC Consultation Were Held Illegal.

The case involves multiple writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 11.9.2003 in Original Application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Challenging Industrial Court Order Directing Promotion of Qualified Employees with Retrospective Effect. Promotion of Unqualified Employee Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Rama Khobragade, an employee of the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board, challenged an order dated 14.07.1995 passed by the In...