Search Results for "symbolic possession"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Eviction Suit Between Sisters — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Ownership of Suit Property Vested in Plaintiff as Title Holder, and Defendants Failed to Prove Benami Transaction or License.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over a residential property in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Vishala Bokapatna Laxman, filed a suit for evict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of SARFAESI Act Auction Sale Where Title Derived from Alleged Forged Documents. Court Considers Whether Auction Purchaser is Entitled to Refund of Sale Consideration on Ground of Fraud.

The writ petition was filed by M/s Paramount Constructions Company challenging the sale certificate dated 10.10.2014 issued by the Authorised Officer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator to Take Possession of Factory Premises Despite Pending BIFR Reference Under SICA, 1985. Section 22 of SICA, 1985 does not bar winding up proceedings under Companies Act, 1956.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions to direct the ex-director of M/s Lifeline Industries Ltd. (in liquidation) to deposit advert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...