Search Results for "snatching"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing his wife with an axe, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapon, and motive of suspicion of infidelity.

The appellant, Vasant Bhalavi, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and for causing hurt under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Mohd. Hussain Kayyum Shaikh, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 302 IPC Based on Dying Declarations. Multiple Consistent Dying Declarations by Deceased Naming Accused as Perpetrator Held Sufficient for Conviction Despite Property Dispute Motive.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by Amit Mishra, the son of the deceased Nirmalabai, against the acquittal of the accused Jagadambaprasad Mis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Conviction for Murder of Parmanand Gaonkar Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive and Last Seen Theory, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Jaisingh Dhondiram Karpe, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Parmanand Gaonkar and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Setting Aside Trial Court's Dismissal. Wife's Refusal to Live with Husband Without Just Cause Constitutes Desertion Under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-husband and respondent-wife married on 16 May 2008 and resided together at the husband's home. A daughter was born on 25 September 2009....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman with 75% Backwages in Unfair Dismissal Case. Employer's challenge to Labour Court order dismissed; workman's cross-petition for full backwages partly allowed.

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute. The workman, S.J. Rajappa, joined AFL Private Ltd. as a loader on 9...