Search Results for "shop premises"

1086 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1086 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Eviction Decree in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Failure to Lead Personal Evidence Proves Fatal. Constituted Attorney's Evidence Held Insufficient to Prove Bonafide Requirement Under Section 115 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (tenants) against the judgment and decree of the appellate court confirming the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and readiness and willingness, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff, Manoj Manilal Gala (appellant), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Landlord Proved Subletting as Tenants Had No Control Over Suit Shop and Sub-Tenants Were in Exclusive Possession Under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) of M.R.C. Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against the judgments and decrees of eviction passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Bona Fide Need of Landlord's Son. Eviction upheld under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 as landlord's son required the suit premises for his independent business.

The petitioner, M/s. Khandelwal Steel & Pipe Distributors, a partnership firm, was a tenant in a three-storied house property owned by the respondents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery and Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence and test identification parade found insufficient to convict accused No.2 under Sections 392, 302, 468, 201 read with 34 IPC.

This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the second accused by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Sessions Case No.724...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Vacate Injunction. Court holds that a tenant cannot be dispossessed without due process of law and that the trial court's order refusing to vacate ad-interim injunction was not perverse.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 24th June 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge on Applications at Exh.5 and Exh.36 in Special Civil...