Search Results for "share fraud"

1103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2011 Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Seeks Reference to ICC Arbitration in Dubai Pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement; the Judgment Text is Incomplete.

The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 10 December 2004 between Welspun Trading Limited (transferor) and Eupec PipeCoatings GmbH...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Auction Purchaser's Appeal in Execution Sale Dispute — High Court Erred in Invalidating Court Auction Without Setting Aside Decree. Court Auction Sale Confirmed Under Order 21 Rule 92 CPC Cannot Be Invalidated Collaterally in Absence of Fraud or Material Irregularity.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by decree holder) against judgment debtor) for recovery of ₹3,75,000 with interest. The suit was decreed ex ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements.

The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Resolves Arbitration Jurisdiction Conflict in Partnership Dispute -- High Court Contradictory Orders on Arbitration Agreement Validity Set Aside -- Civil Suit Directed to Proceed for Determination of Admission Deed Validity

The Supreme Court resolved conflicting High Court orders regarding arbitration in a partnership dispute where the existence of the arbitration agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Title Suit Due to Fraud and Fabrication — Lok Adalat Decree Set Aside as Collusive and Without Proper Verification. Compromise Decree Obtained by Fraud is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Smt. Padmavati, originally filed a writ petition challenging a compromise decree dated 27.09.2010 passed in O.S. No.243 of 2010 on the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...