Search Results for "separate business"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "separate business"

4184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4184 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Dacoity. Search Conducted Under Section 17 of Bihar Sales Tax Act Deemed Valid as Premises Where Duplicate Accounts Found Qualify as Place of Business Under Section 2(1).

30 Apr 1968

The case arose from a raid conducted by the Superintendent of Commercial Taxes (Intelligence Branch) at the premises of the first appellant, a dealer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case on Interpretation of Explanation to Section 73 — Share Trading Loss Not Speculative Where Non-Speculative Income Exceeds Loss. The court held that gross total income for the exception includes all income chargeable under the Act, and if non-speculative income exceeds speculative loss, the exception applies.

2 Feb 2012

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - STP Undertaking Exemption Denied as Manufacturing Commenced Before 1 April 1994. The court held that the conditions of Section 10A(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not fulfilled because the undertaking had already started manufacturing before the cutoff date, and the subsequent slump sale did not affect the commencement date.

6 Mar 2012

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing the assessee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Addition of Interest Income. The Court held that interest income from fixed deposits made out of borrowed funds is assessable under 'Income from Other Sources' and not 'Business Income', and that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen assessment under Section 147 without fresh tangible material.

23 Jul 2018

The case involves two cross-appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the same order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of Order and Reference under Section 92BA(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner challenges classification of three transactions as Specified Domestic Transactions based on related party and expenditure definitions.

20 Dec 2018

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order and reference passed by the Assistant ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Partition Decree. Trial Court Had Decreed Suit for Partition and Separate Possession, and Appeals Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Challenge That Decree.

22 Dec 2022

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Allowability of Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act. The Appeal Raises the Question Whether Payment of Redemption Fine for Illegal Import of Goods Qualifies as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Feb 2019

In this appeal before the Bombay High Court, the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had allowed a deduction of Rs...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)