Search Results for "section 70(1)"

377 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 377 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Matter for Lack of Maintainability — Orders Under Section 34 Not Setting Aside or Refusing to Set Aside Award Are Not Appealable Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal filed by Home Care Retail Marts Private Limited under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Assessee's payments for call center services and software maintenance not subject to TDS under Section 194J of Income Tax Act, 1961 as they do not constitute 'technical services'.

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the order of the Income Tax ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...