Search Results for "retirement notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "retirement notice"

1583 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1583 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Ayurvedic College Teachers Who Voluntarily Retired or Resigned After Qualifying Service. Employees of aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institutions are entitled to pension and gratuity benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, read with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioners, five retired doctors and one other employee, were employed at various aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Government Employees — Rule of Promulgation and Publication of Statutory Rules Upheld. Reduction of retirement age from 60 to 58 years invalid due to non-publication of amended rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, five retired government employees of the Public Works Department in Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Retirement Age of Polytechnic Lecturers at 58 Years as Against Claimed 60 Years. Petitions Under Article 226 of Constitution of India Seek to Quash Retirement Communication and Government Resolution Dated 27 February 2003, Citing All India Council for Technical Education Service Conditions.

29 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the retiremen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Retiral Benefits Case — Employee Who Joined Another Service Without Sanction Not Entitled to Pension. Abandonment of Service Disentitles Employee to Voluntary Retirement Benefits Under UP Fundamental Rules.

10 Dec 2019

The case involves two appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The respondent, Dr. Sudarshana Chatterje...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired MIDC Employee Challenging Initiation of Enquiry After Superannuation and Withholding of Retiral Benefits. Disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated after retirement without specific service rule provision; retiral benefits cannot be withheld without following procedure under Rule 9(1) of MIDC Employees' Pension Rules, 1987.

8 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Pratapsinh Kedar Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) who served for over 33 years and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Retirement Benefits Withheld Due to Caste Certificate Dispute — DOPT Circular Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Without Following Principles of Natural Justice.

10 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Dilip Chintaman Nandankar, was a Development Officer appointed on 20.05.1987 in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in the New India Ass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired Professor in University Departmental Enquiry — Delay and Lack of Sanction Render Proceedings Invalid. Post-retirement disciplinary proceedings initiated after superannuation without prior sanction under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and with inordinate delay, are unsustainable.

18 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Dr. Dipak Vishwnathrao Muley, a retired Professor of Shivaji University, Kolhapur, challenged a chargesheet dated 28 August 2018 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

8 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Former Bank Employees Seeking Pension After Resignation — Resignation Not Equivalent to Voluntary Retirement Under Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. The court held that resignation is a voluntary act of giving up employment and does not entitle an employee to pension under Regulation 22 of the Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995, as the petitioners had not completed 20 years of qualifying service and their resignations were not treated as voluntary retirement.

21 Jul 2017

The petitioners were former employees of the Bank of India who had resigned from service. They filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the bank to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Premature Retirement Order Set Aside as Review Committee Failed to Consider Entire Service Record and Adverse Remarks Were Not Communicated.

25 Nov 2019

The Petitioner, a District Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement from service on attaining the age of 55 years, by an order dated 12/07/2018. He...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)