Search Results for "retirement benefit"

992 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 992 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Income Tax Commissioner's Petition for Full Pension and Retiral Benefits. Rule of 50% Deduction for Less Than 10 Years Qualifying Service Under Rule 49(2)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable to Petitioner Who Served Over 30 Years.

The petitioner, B.B. Rajendra Prasad, a retired Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Central Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Benefit to Development Officer. Court holds that the Scheme's eligibility conditions are clear and the petitioner's application was rightly rejected as he did not meet the qualifying service requirement.

The petitioner, K.G.H. Dodhiya, joined the New India Assurance Company Limited as a Development Officer on 16 April 1977 and later became an Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Classification of Pensioners Based on Retirement Date Held Arbitrary Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Air Force Officers' Premature Separation Cases. Officers Cannot Withdraw PSS Application After Availing Pre-Release Course Under Human Resource Policy.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals concerning four officers of the Indian Air Force who applied for Premature Separation from Service (PSS) un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...