Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

222 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in M/s Ashmit Motors Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside as passed without hearing the establishment.

19 Sep 2016

The petitioner, M/s Ashmit Motors Private Limited, a car dealership, challenged two orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner: (1) an...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

22 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Withdrawal Claims by Retired Employees Despite Delay — Limitation Not Applicable to Claims Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the right to withdraw provident fund is a continuing right and cannot be defeated by the employer's failure to deposit contributions or by delay in filing claims.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired employees, Durgasri Srinivas Kallakuri and Amit Gunvantrai Mehta, against the Employees' Pro...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Coverage for Establishment with 20 Employees Including Contractual Security Guards. Security guards engaged through agency are employees of the principal establishment for PF coverage under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s Silicon Cortec, challenged the order dated 03.10.2005 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and the subsequent order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging EPF Order Due to Non-Functional Appellate Tribunal. Alternate remedy under Section 7I of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 not a bar when tribunal is vacant.

11 Sep 2018

The petitioner, HVPM's Degree College of Physical Education, Amravati, through its Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in EPF Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Computer consultancy not covered under notification dated 17th May 1971 extending Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments rendering expert services.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal that it...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging PF Applicability — Employer Failed to Disprove Inspector's Report of 20+ Employees. ESI Returns Not Conclusive for PF Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioner, M/s Ajmeri Gold Fingers, a proprietorship concern, challenged the order dated 28/3/2007 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs EPFO to Pay Interest on Delayed Provident Fund Settlement — Paragraph 60(6) of EPF Scheme 1952 Held Not a Bar to Interest Claim. Petitioner entitled to interest from date of retirement till actual payment under Paragraph 72(7) of EPF Scheme 1952.

13 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mr. M.V. Kanakaraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the Regional C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Sugar Factory's Challenge Against EPF Appellate Tribunal Order on Damages Levy. Employer's Failure to Deposit Provident Fund Contributions Within Prescribed Time Attracts Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, But Quantum Must Be Proportionate and Not Arbitrary.

6 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960...

High Court

High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging EPFO Circular on Arrest Warrants - No Public Interest Found in Employee's Challenge to Departmental Instructions. The Court held that a petition by an Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner challenging an internal circular regarding issuance of arrest warrants under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 is not maintainable as a public interest litigation.

30 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Sudarshan Kumar Singh, an Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), filed a Public I...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)