Search Results for "recreational area"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "recreational area"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Challenge by Developer to Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Orders Passed by Competent Authority Under MOFA. Developer Argues Conveyed Land Exceeds Area Agreed in Section 4 Agreements and Jeopardises Pending Construction; Court Examines Principles of Land Division and Effect of Amalgamated Layout.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a developer, filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 22 November 2023 and 2 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registra...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and ...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Industrial Plot to Residential Zone in Town Planning Scheme — Arbitrary Zoning Violates Article 14. Petitioner's plot in I-2 zone surrounded by residential properties; court holds that zoning must be rational and non-arbitrary, and directs conversion on payment of premium under DCPR 2034.

9 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Rational Art & Press Private Limited, owned Final Plot No. 951(A) on Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai, which was zoned as industrial (I-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

13 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

1 Jan 1970

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)