Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Senior Bailiff in Service Matter Due to Departmental Error. Recovery of Excess Salary for 29-Year Period Set Aside as No Misrepresentation Shown, Causing Extreme Hardship Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, who was appointed as a Senior Bailiff in 1993, received an Official Memorandum dated 09.06.2022 from the 6th respondent stating that h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Auction Sale Under Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 — Failure to Challenge Sale Under Sections 37-A or 38. Appellant's challenge to auction notice without challenging the subsequent sale held not maintainable.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment of the Madras High Court dismissing the appellant's challenge to a public auction notice issued un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Pensionary Benefits from Retired Class III Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Rs.77,446/- directed after 17 years of pay fixation without misrepresentation by employee held unsustainable.

The petitioner, Devidas Marotirao Kandhare, a retired junior clerk (Class III) under the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Employees of Private Unaided Educational Institutes Seeking Regularisation. Institutes Not 'Schools' Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977, Hence No Entitlement to Absorption.

The petitioners, numbering 41 individuals, were employees of two private unaided educational institutes: Adv. V. R. Manohar Institute of Diploma in Ph...