Search Results for "railway administration"

842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of RPF Constable for Dog's Bite Incident — Holds That Disciplinary Authority Cannot Impose Higher Punishment Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing to Delinquent Under Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968.

The petitioner, a constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) working as a dog handler of a dog named 'Rover', was subjected to disciplinary proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways' Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Case. Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Caused by Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railways) against an award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, in Claim Application No.16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed 'Passenger' Under Railways Act Despite Free Pass. Free travel pass issued by Railway Recruitment Board constitutes valid ticket for 'untoward incident' compensation under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Smt. Vaishali wd/o Nitesh Bhalerao, filed a claim for compensation of Rs. 7 lakhs before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, fol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Compensation Claim for Untoward Incident Death. Claimants' Failure to Prove Bona Fide Passenger Status Not Fatal as Railway Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, challenging a judgment and award passed by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Untoward Incident Compensation Case — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, South Central Railway, against the judgment and award dated 24th April 2008 passed by the Railway Claims T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...