Search Results for "public welfare scheme"

1207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Medical Reimbursement Under Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana for Ayurvedic Treatment of Deceased Husband. Treatment at Government-Recognized Ayurvedic Hospital Held Covered Under Scheme Despite Initial Denial by Insurance Company.

The petitioner, Kiran Bhaskar Surgade, widow of Dr. B.S. Surgade, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for the tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MPLADS Circular Allowing Funds for Private Hospitals in COVID-19 Relief. Circular dated April 8, 2020, permitting MPLADS funds for private hospitals is intra vires the MPLAD Scheme and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a circular dated April 8, 2020, issued by the Joint Secretary (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Suo Motu Directions to State to Ensure Proper Care for Mentally Deficient Children in Homes. State’s Failure to Implement Juvenile Justice Act Provisions Prompted Mandatory Directions for Streamlined Recognition, Management Committees, and Mental Health Care.

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation was initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on the basis of a newspaper report dated 24 August 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Public Interest Litigation Seeking Phase-Out of Horse Carriages and Enforcement of Animal Welfare Laws. Petitioners Plead Violation of Article 51A(g) and Statutory Provisions; Respondents Acknowledge Licensing Deficiencies and Reduction in Victorias.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Animals and Birds Charitable Trust and others, highli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...