Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Renders Search Illegal Under Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, dated 7th May 1987, which acquitted the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detenu's Past Offences Under NDPS Act Do Not Justify Preventive Detention Without Proximity to Public Order.

The petitioner, Mohammed Firoz @ Firoz Chor, through his wife Ronakanjuman Shaikh, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26.12.2025 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(e) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere involvement in illicit traffic without affecting public order does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Kazimali @ Wasim Yunusali @ Saiyedsaab Saiyed, filed a petition through his brother-in-law challenging a preventive detention order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence to Minimum in NDPS Case Considering First-Time Offender and Family Circumstances. The Court reduced the sentence from fifteen years to ten years for possession of 10.496 kgs of charas under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Shyam Prashad, was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possession of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses — Non-Compliance with Sections 55 and 57 of NDPS Act, 1985, Causes Prejudice to Accused. State Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession of Brown Sugar Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, dated 15/7/1994, acquitting the respondent-accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convicted Nigerian National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50. Non-Corroboration by Independent Witnesses Renders Mandatory Search Procedure Invalid, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

This appeal was filed against the conviction of a Nigerian national under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. On 5...