Search Results for "promotion not vested right"

614 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 614 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Union of India’s Writ Petition Against CAT Order Granting Promotion Consideration to Retired Officer. Promotion Not a Vested Right; Consideration Arises Only When Vacancy Notified and DPC Convened, and No Junior Promoted Before Retirement.

The writ petition was filed by the Union of India, through the Central Board of Excise and Customs, challenging an order of the Central Administrative...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Against Union Recognition in Industrial Dispute. Court upholds Industrial Court's finding that petitioner failed to prove loss of majority support by respondent union under Section 22 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Directing Seniority Revision and Promotion After Petitioner Already Promoted — Education Officer Lacks Jurisdiction Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules Once Promotion Is Granted.

The petitioner, Girish Suresh Jambhalikar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 10.07.1995 in a school run by respondent No.3 Management. He posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Reservation Promotion Rule. Rule 3 of Maharashtra Public Services (Reservation) Rules, 2017 Held Ultra Vires for Non-Compliance with Article 16(4A) Conditions.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, and the Director, Higher Education, filed two writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Officiating Appointment and Extensions for Chief Electrical Engineer Post. Seniority and Eligibility for Promotion Under Goa Electricity Department Recruitment Rules Examined.

The case involves a challenge by Laxmikant D. Kolvekar, the Chief Electrical Engineer (officiating), against the State of Goa and others regarding the...