Search Results for "preventive detention"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "preventive detention"

664 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

8 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Did Not Show Prejudicial Activity After Release.

7 Mar 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Chandrakant Prabhakar Todankar, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Relied on Extraneous Material Including Inapplicable Sections. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Reliance on Irrelevant Documents Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

29 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Pawan Tukaram Kudale, challenged a detention order dated 29 January 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Criminal Cases Not Considered. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's bail status vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26 April 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

22 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in COFEPOSA Detention Case, Upholding High Court's Refusal to Set Aside Order. The Court Found Compliance with Article 22(5) of the Constitution as Authorities Served Grounds in Bengali and Informed Detenue of Right to Representation Despite His Refusal, Based on Signed Panchnama and Diligent Attempts.

4 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the brother-in-law of a detenue challenging a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prev...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)