Search Results for "pension denial"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "pension denial"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pension Revision Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Denial of Benefits Based on Non-Existent Circular Held Illegal. The court directed the respondents to consider revision of pension for pre-2006 retirees under Government Resolution dated 10.07.2017 and Rule 110 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

8 Mar 2022

The petitioners, 24 retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, filed a writ petition seeking revision of their pension under the Government Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Bank Employee Who Took VRS — Rule 22 of SBI Pension Fund Rules Interpreted Liberally. Court held that the petitioner, who completed 20 years of pensionable service before voluntary retirement, is entitled to pension under Rule 22(1)(c) irrespective of age.

5 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Rugmini Ganesh, was appointed as a clerk in the State Bank of India on 01/09/1980 on probation and was confirmed on 01/03/1981. She to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Pension Dispute, Holding Resignation Forfeits Past Service. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Rules Came Into Force Not Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Despite Completing 22 Years of Service.

5 Dec 2019

The case involves an appeal by BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. against a Delhi High Court judgment granting pensionary benefits to the first respondent, Ghansh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension Revision of Retired Zilla Parishad Employees — Denial of Benefits Based on Circular Held Unjustified. The court held that a circular cannot override statutory rules and that pre-1998 retirees are entitled to pension revision under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

5 Nov 2019

The petitioners, 16 retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, filed a writ petition seeking revision of their pension and other retiral bene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Part-Time Teacher's Pension Claim — Part-Time Employee Not Entitled to Pension Under MCGM Pension Rules. Continuous service for 24 years as part-time teacher does not confer full-time status or pension eligibility under the Bombay Municipal Corporation (Pension) Rules, 1992.

20 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Pradnya Padmakar Damle, worked as a part-time teacher for deaf students under the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) from ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Option to Voluntary Retiree in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Case — Regulation 18 of Pension Regulations Applies for Eligibility, Not Just Calculation. The court held that the bank's communication denying pension eligibility under Regulation 18 was erroneous and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's pension option.

21 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vandana w/o Eknath Bhondwe, a retired employee of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (now State Bank of India), filed a writ petition chal...

High Court

High Court Considers Extension of Superannuation Pension to Teachers in Private Unaided Ayurvedic and Social Work Colleges; Earlier Finding of Discrimination Under Constitution Upheld by Apex Court Being Enforced. Petitioners Seek Implementation of 1983 Pension Scheme Following Supreme Court's Direction for Phased Extension.

10 Jun 2013

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, seeking superannuation pension for teaching and non-teach...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Under CRPF Rules — Liberal Interpretation of 'Family' Includes Widow Despite Husband's Remarriage. The Court held that the definition of 'family' under Rule 5 of CRPF Rules, 1971 includes the first wife, and denial of pension would be unjust.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Ranjana w/o Bhaskar Anasane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking family pension as the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Special Leave Petition in Pension Calculation Dispute Under Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996. Past Service with State-Controlled Entities Must Be Counted for Pension as Resignation Was with Proper Permission for Another Government Appointment Under Rule 25(2).

19 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Rajasthan's refusal to count the Respondent's service tenure from 13 January 1967 to 12 April 1977, during which h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension Claim Under Swatantra Sainik Sanman Pension Scheme 1980 for Goa Liberation Movement Phase II Participants. The court held that the cut-off date of 1/08/2002 for pension eligibility was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Shri Sitakant S. Dubhashi, claimed to be a noted freedom fighter who participated in the liberation movement of Goa, Daman and Diu Pha...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)