Search Results for "partnership retirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "partnership retirement"

136 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act — High Court Exceeded Section 482 CrPC Jurisdiction by Deciding Disputed Facts on Partnership Retirement Without Trial. The Court Held That Statutory Compliance Under Partnership Act Is Essential for Effective Retirement and That Allegations of Involvement in Firm's Affairs Satisfy Section 141 NI Act.

19 May 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Shivappa Reddy against the order of the Karnataka High Court which had quashed criminal proceedings unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Rent Control Subletting Case — Tenancy Terminated Under Section 16(1)(e) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court upheld the Appellate Bench's finding that the tenant had sublet the premises to persons who were not family members, and that the earlier judgment regarding adoption did not create res judicata.

5 Jul 2024

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendants (applicants) challenging the judgment and order dated 1 November 2023 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Revisional Court's Order Allowing Amendment to Add Partnership Firm as Accused Upheld as No Prejudice Caused.

28 Apr 2023

The case arises from a criminal writ petition filed by the petitioners (original accused and the partnership firm) challenging the judgment and order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Interim Applications in Partnership Dispute — Parties Agree to Consent Terms for Capital Contribution and Interest Determination. The Court disposed of the applications as withdrawn, recording the consent order dated 18.01.2022 which required additional capital contributions and referral of interest disputes to the firm's Chartered Accountant.

14 Sep 2022

The present matter involves two Interim Applications (IA No. 3499 of 2022 and IA No. 3873 of 2021) filed by Prakash Balasaheb Chavan and Others (Appli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Registered Trademark 'Cothas' Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Cotha'. Prior Registration and Use of 'Cothas' Since 1995 Establishes Prima Facie Case Under Sections 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Cothas Coffee Co., a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, M/s. Cotha Associ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Unlawful Subletting and Bonafide Requirement. Subletting Camouflaged as Partnership and Bonafide Requirement Established Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

17 Feb 2016

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over eviction from suit premises. The petitioners (landlords) filed Regular Civil Suit No. 43 of 1986 seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contained an arbitration clause, and thus appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the partners.

20 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Shri Prabhakar Reddy, a founder partner of M/s. Classic Enterprises, filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years quashed as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons constituted a change of opinion.

4 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Anil Radhakrishna Wani, a solicitor and advocate, was a partner of Little & Company and retired on 30 September 2002. Upon retirement,...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)