Search Results for "parental consent"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Mother Seeking Custody of Minor Daughter from Father. Custody Dispute Between Parents Must Be Adjudicated Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Not Through Habeas Corpus, as Father's Custody as Natural Guardian Is Not Per Se Illegal.

The petitioner, Kinjal, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of her four-year-old daughter Trishika, alleging that the child was in the u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Sexual Assault Case Based on Compromise Between Close Relatives. Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Exercised to Quash Non-Compoundable Offences Where Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary, Despite Recording of Evidence.

The applicant, Sheshrao Jadhav, was the sole accused in a criminal trial arising from Crime No. 696/2020 for offences under Sections 354, 354-A, 452, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shri Monappa Parava, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi District, Udupi in S.C. No. 16/2016 for offences punishable u...