Bombay High Court Allows Mother's Petition for Educational Expenses of Minor Son Under Section 26 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Emphasizes Child's Welfare Over Parental Consent for School Change. The court directed the father to pay school fees and co-curricular expenses, holding that the father's obligation to maintain the child includes educational expenses and the child's welfare is paramount.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Uma Ashish Ghate, mother of minor son Master Dhruva, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 10/09/2015 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court No.1, Pune, rejecting her application under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for educational expenses of her son. The petitioner submitted that Master Dhruva was in her custody and studying in 6th standard at Vigbyor High School, requiring Rs.1,39,750/- as school fees and Rs.18,000/- for co-curricular activities. The Family Court had earlier granted interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month, which was insufficient to cover these expenses. The Family Court rejected the application solely on the ground that the petitioner changed the school from Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan School to Vigbyor High School without the knowledge and consent of the respondent-father. The petitioner contended that the change was made with the respondent's consent, as evidenced by the enrollment form. The High Court, after hearing both parties, held that the welfare of the child is paramount and the father cannot avoid liability merely because the mother changed the school. The court noted that the enrollment form showed the father's signature, indicating consent. Even otherwise, the father's obligation to maintain the child includes educational expenses. The court allowed the petition, set aside the Family Court's order, and directed the respondent to pay Rs.1,39,750/- towards school fees and Rs.18,000/- towards co-curricular activities within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Section 26 - Educational Expenses of Minor Child - Welfare of Child - The Family Court rejected the mother's application for educational expenses of the minor son on the ground that she changed the school without the father's consent. The High Court held that the welfare of the child is paramount and the father cannot escape liability merely because the mother changed the school. The court directed the father to pay Rs.1,39,750/- towards school fees and Rs.18,000/- towards co-curricular activities. (Paras 3-8)

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Section 26 - Maintenance - Change of School - Consent of Father - The court observed that the mother had changed the school with the father's consent, as evidenced by the enrollment form. Even otherwise, the father's obligation to maintain the child includes educational expenses, and the child's welfare cannot be compromised by lack of consent. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court was justified in rejecting the mother's application for educational expenses of the minor son solely on the ground that she changed the school without the father's consent, and whether the father is liable to pay such expenses under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 10/09/2015 passed by the Family Court, and directed the respondent-father to pay Rs.1,39,750/- towards school fees and Rs.18,000/- towards co-curricular activities of Master Dhruva within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Section 26 of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • welfare of child
  • educational expenses
  • maintenance
  • change of school
  • consent of father
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 98

WRIT PETITION NO. 11308 OF 2015

2017-10-09

DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

Mr.Sanjay Bhojwani for the Petitioner, Mr.Abhijit D. Sarwate for the Respondent

Uma Ashish Ghate

Ashish Anil Ghate

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of Family Court rejecting application for educational expenses of minor son under Section 26 of Hindu Marriage Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-mother sought direction to respondent-father to pay Rs.1,39,750/- towards school fees and Rs.18,000/- towards co-curricular activities of minor son Master Dhruva.

Filing Reason

Family Court rejected the application on the ground that the mother changed the school without father's consent.

Previous Decisions

Family Court had earlier granted interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month.

Issues

Whether the Family Court was justified in rejecting the mother's application for educational expenses solely on the ground of change of school without father's consent. Whether the father is liable to pay educational expenses under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the change of school was with the consent of the respondent-father, as evidenced by the enrollment form, and that the father is liable to pay educational expenses. Respondent argued that the mother changed the school without his knowledge and consent, and therefore she cannot claim expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

The welfare of the child is paramount. The father's obligation to maintain the child under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 includes educational expenses. The mother's change of school, even without consent, does not absolve the father from liability, especially when the change was in the child's interest and with consent as per the enrollment form.

Judgment Excerpts

the Family Court, has vide its earlier order granted an amount of Rs.5,000/- per month only, as interim maintenance and in the said amount these educational expenses of the child cannot be satisfied. the reason given by the Family Court for rejecting the application cannot sustain as the Petitioner has admitted Dhruva in the Vigbyor School with consent of the Respondent and it was a joint decision of the Petitioner and the Respondent.

Procedural History

The petitioner-mother filed an application under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, Pune, seeking educational expenses for her minor son. The Family Court rejected the application on 10/09/2015. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Mother's Petition for Educational Expenses of Minor Son Under Section 26 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Emphasizes Child's Welfare Over Parental Consent for School Change. The court directed the father to pay school fees and...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Employees' Union Against EPFO for Treating Provident Fund Account as Inoperative and Denying Interest. The court held that when an establishment is transferred as a going concern and employees continue in ser...