Search Results for "paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "paid"

17641 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17641 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.

20 Mar 2013

The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reinstates Conviction Under Section 138. Partial Recovery Before Cheque Issuance Does Not Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act When Cheque Covers Balance Due.

19 Aug 2022

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Sessions Court, Amravati, which set aside the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Against Coercive Recovery of Service Tax Without Adjudication, Examining Scope of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. The Court Considers Whether Revenue Can Take Steps Under Section 87 Absent Determination of Tax Liability Through Statutory Adjudication Process.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., a scheduled bank, challenged a communication dated 25/3/2015 issued by the Service Tax authorities demanding interest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

14 Jul 2023

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

24 Jun 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in MAT Credit Case — Credit for Brought Forward MAT Must Be Given Before Computing Interest Under Section 234B of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that MAT credit reduces the tax payable on assessment and must be deducted from gross demand before charging interest under Section 234B.

6 Apr 2010

The appeal by the Revenue arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 20 June 2007, concerning assessment year 2000-2001. The asses...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance of Interest on Funds Advanced to Sister Concern Not Justified When Own Funds Exceed Advances. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that no disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is warranted when the assessee's own funds are sufficient to cover advances to sister concerns.

7 Oct 2015

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tr...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)