Search Results for "ownership period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership period"

3059 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3059 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Right Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Mutation Entry Not Sufficient to Establish Res Judicata. The court held that a mutation entry recording rejection of an earlier application under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, without the underlying order, does not bar a subsequent application on principles of res judicata.

2 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a trust challenging the orders of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) and the Agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Vehicle Ownership in Favor of Auction Purchaser Despite Pending Tax Dues. Held that the transferee cannot be saddled with prior tax liabilities of the transferor under Section 50 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

6 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Raman Roadways Private Limited, a private limited company engaged in transportation business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff's Possessory Rights Upheld Based on Agreement and Expenditure. Court held that the plaintiff had established his right to occupy the suit premises based on a family arrangement and his contribution to construction costs.

24 Mar 2005

The case involves a family dispute between a mother (defendant No.1) and her son (plaintiff) over possession of a bungalow. The plaintiff, a doctor, r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Set Aside Parts of Arbitral Award on Partnership Trademark Ownership. Clause 6 of 2003 Partnership Deed Excluded Trademarks, Goodwill, and Name from Partnership Assets, Vesting Them Exclusively in Two Individuals.

6 May 2015

The Bombay High Court heard two cross-petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit — Permission of Rent Controller Not Required. The Court held that the C.P. & Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 ceased to apply after the tenant vacated and the landlord re-let the premises on a fresh oral lease, making the eviction suit maintainable without prior permission.

29 Jun 2017

The appellant (original defendant) and respondent (original plaintiff) were parties to a suit for eviction. The plaintiff claimed ownership of a const...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Lease of Manjeetnagar Garden Space to Private Sports Club. Petition Alleges Illegal Diversion of Recreational Open Space Under Development Control Rules and Building Bye-Laws

29 Feb 2016

The writ petition challenged an agreement dated 30.3.1998 between the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation and the Icon National Sports Club, leasing a 26...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Legal Heirs Not Entitled to Protection After Death of Original Tenant. The court held that Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, does not protect legal heirs of a deceased tenant, and the eviction order was restored.

23 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust, filed an application under Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural L...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal by Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration of Title by Adverse Possession and Oral Gift; Trial Court Had Partly Decreed Suit Granting Injunction but Denying Declaration. The Appeal Raises the Issue Whether Trial Court Erred in Rejecting the Claim of Adverse Possession Despite Long Possession.

23 Dec 2020

The dispute concerned a suit property bearing Sy.No.152/5 measuring 1 acre 4 guntas at Bilekahalli village, Bangalore. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)