Search Results for "notice under section 34(1)"

472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Family Clash Case, Extends Benefit of Probation of Offenders Act to Appellant. Conviction under Sections 326, 325, 452, 323 IPC Affirmed but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Considering Settlement in Cross Case.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had partly allowed the appeal of the appellant Ramesh, affirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raised a grievance that residential and commercial properties of persons ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.

The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 506, 341 r/w 34 IPC and Sections 3 & 27 of Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of one person on 25.05.2002 at Maragodu Village, Madikeri Taluk. The appellant Kattemane Ganesha (accused No.1) was co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Orders in Murder Case Due to Non-Speaking Orders and Failure to Consider Crime Seriousness. High Court Erred in Granting Bail Without Assessing Brutality of Offence and Implications of Section 149 IPC in Case Involving 26 Injuries on Deceased.

The Supreme Court heard appeals filed by the original informant and brother of the deceased against the Rajasthan High Court's orders granting bail to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against State Officers for Alleged Non-Compliance of Directions in Service Seniority Case. Held That State Had Compiled by Collecting Quantifiable Data and Issuing Fresh Notification, No Willful Disobedience Established.

The contempt petitions were filed by Bajrang Lal Sharma, a Rajasthan Administrative Service officer, alleging willful disobedience of the Supreme Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 325 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naga, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-IV, Mysore, for the offence punishable under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Halba Scheduled Tribe Claim. Court Holds That Documentary Evidence from 1923 Prevails Over Anthropological Texts, and Halba and Halbi Are the Same Tribe Under Entry 19 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Rama Nandanwar, challenged the order dated 31 July 2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amrav...