Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

397 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

17 Feb 2026

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

High Court

High Court Dismisses Applicants Revision Applications Against Multiple Borrowers in Loan Recovery Case Due to Procedural Deficiencies and Lack of Jurisdictional Error

4 Feb 2026

The High Court dismissed a series of Civil Revision Applications filed by Applicant challenging the dismissal of its applications for restoration of s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Restore Suit Dismissed for Default, Setting Aside Order That Rejected Restoration on Ground of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that dismissal for default does not bar restoration and that the trial court must decide the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on merits.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, K. M. Dastagir Sab, filed a suit (O.S.No.1280/2020) before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, seeking rel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash SARFAESI Act Notices and Orders Against Guarantors Due to Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) Requirements. The court held that proper service of notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act is mandatory before taking possession under Section 13(4), and failure to prove service renders the entire action invalid.

17 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi and his wife Sushila S. Kankanwadi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case. Loan Agreement and Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Established Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Finance Limited, a non-banking finance company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property for Non-Compliance with Recovery Rules. Court holds that failure to serve notice of sale proclamation on the judgment-debtor at his updated address vitiates the sale, but the petitioners failed to approach the Recovery Officer under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 within the prescribed period or seek condonation of delay with sufficient cause.

10 Jun 2015

The petitioners, M/s. Hotel Paras Garden and its proprietor Prabhakar Digambar Lande, challenged the auction sale of their mortgaged property conducte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SFC's Claim for Priority Over Central Excise Dues in Recovery from Borrower's Assets. State Financial Corporation's Statutory Charge Under Section 29 of SFC Act, 1951 Prevails Over Crown Debt Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

18 Jul 2006

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, advanced a term loan of Rs. 51...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SFC Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act, 1951 — Guarantors Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Guarantee is a separate contract and liability of guarantor is co-extensive with principal debtor under Section 128 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

7 Jun 2005

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 ag...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)