Search Results for "misconceived"

2468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Under MRTP Act; Section 24(2) of New Land Acquisition Act Held Inapplicable. Acquisition Proceeding Saved by Section 114 of 2013 Act and Section 6 of General Clauses Act, Compensation Determined per Section 24(1)(a).

The petitioner, owner of land admeasuring 9 Gunthas of City Survey No. 3328 at Bhosari, challenged an acquisition award under the Maharashtra Regional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges for Housing Scheme — Upholds Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act and Karnataka Housing Board Act. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of statutory provisions or fundamental rights in acquisition for public purpose.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for a housing scheme by the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Development Dispute — Plaintiff Allowed to Bring on Record Subsequent Events Including Deed of Conveyance and Alleged Fraudulent Tenancy. Court holds that pre-trial amendments should be liberally allowed to determine real controversy between parties.

The plaintiff, M/s SR Enterprises, filed a Commercial Suit against defendants Gurbachan Kaur Jattinder Singh Chadha and another, arising out of a Deve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Suit for Want of Written Statement. Rule 89 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules Allows Judgment Without Separate Notice of Motion Where Written Statement Not Filed Within Time.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the 1st defendant (Aviation Travels Pvt Ltd) seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 7th October 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Possession and Title. Trial court's dismissal of suit and decree of counter claim set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence.

The appellant, P V Kamesh Kumar, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications as Belated and Misconceived. Refund Claim for Rs. 9.24 Crore Rejected Due to Delay and Laches, as Petition Filed After Six Years from Imposition of Duty.

The petitioner, Sansar Texturisers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two notifications dated...