Search Results for "male victim"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(3) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Khadar @ Rafiq, was convicted by the Child Friendly Court, Bengaluru, in Spl.C.C.No.30/2016 for offences under Section 376(3) IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals and Upholds Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under Sections 363 and 376(D) IPC. DNA Analysis of Undergarment Stains Proved Guilt of All Four Accused, Trivializing Contradictions in Victim’s Narration and Test Identification Failures.

Background: The appeals arose from the conviction of four men by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Special Criminal (Child) Case No. 14 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...