High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple Second Appeals in Dispute Between Acharyas and Plaintiffs Over Mahanubhav Ashram – Suit Involves Questions of Religious Practice and Trust Management
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "intervener"
262 result(s) found
Found 262 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Seeking Impleadment in Union Recognition Proceedings — Employee's Resignation from Union Does Not Confer Locus Standi to Intervene in Recognition Application Under MRTU & PULP Act.
26 Sep 2006The petitioner, Shri Gireesh U.G. Menon, was an employee of M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co. and a former member of the Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha (Respondent No....
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Execution — Detenu Surrendered Voluntarily After 17 Years, Detention Order Held Stale and Non-Operative. The court held that an unexplained delay of 17 years between the passing of a detention order under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 and its execution renders the order stale and vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority.
10 Oct 2012The petitioner, Smt. Heena Kausar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside a preventive det...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute — Upholds Validity of Scheme for Administration of Public Trust. The court held that the Charity Commissioner has jurisdiction to frame a scheme under Section 50A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, and that the scheme was not contrary to the wishes of the founder.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a first appeal filed by the trustees of a public trust against an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, framing a scheme ...
- 101
Tribunals
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Homebuyers Associations Against NCLT Order Rejecting Impleadment in CIRP — Allottees Held to Be Financial Creditors Under IBC Entitled to Be Heard. The Tribunal directed impleadment of the associations in the pending application before the Adjudicating Authority to ensure their right to be heard is protected.
30 Nov -0001The case involves four appeals filed by two residents' associations (Sharon Hills Residents Association and Angelwoods Apartments Allottees Associatio...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging NCLT Order De-freezing MPID Attached Accounts. MPID Act Overrides IBC for Attachment and Confiscation of Properties of Financial Establishments.
9 Nov 2020The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Collector and Competent Authority (NSEL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India Examines Constitutionality of Senior Advocate Designation Process Under Section 16 of Advocates Act, 1961. Writ Petitions Challenge Voting Method and Seek Uniform Guidelines for Designation, Including Validity of Supreme Court Rules 2013 and High Court Guidelines.
1 Aug 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Divisional Commissioner's Order in Municipal Disqualification Case. Court Holds That Independent Corporator Cannot Be Treated as Member of Political Party Without Consent Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987.
6 Mar 2018The petitioner, Lokashahi Aghadi, through its leader Shital Gaikwad, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 7.4.2017 issued by the Di...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.
1 Jan 1970Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.
24 Mar 2023This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...
- 363
