Search Results for "interregnum period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "interregnum period"

621 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 621 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

11 May 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Suspension Allowance in Service Law Case — Petitioner Entitled to Suspension Allowance Under Rule 68(2) of Gujarat Civil Services (Joining Time, Foreign Service, Deputation Out of India, Payment During Suspension) Rules, 2002 for Period Between Conviction and Removal from Service. Court Directs Payment with 6% Interest, Rejects Higher Interest Claim.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Sandeep Vinodkumar Nathwani, was appointed as an Assistant Professor (G.E.S. - Class-II) with Respondent No.3 after clearing the GPSC ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

23 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Minor Penalty on Government Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Unauthorized Absence. Withholding of One Increment for Two Years Held Proportional Under Rule 11(iv) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

28 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Mr. Hanamatrao M. Kulkarni, was a Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, recruited in 1983. He...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Seniority and Promotion Dispute Among Tahsildars. Court holds that the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding seniority and promotion of Tahsildars was justified pending final adjudication.

17 Dec 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order dated 22.10.2019 passed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Upholds Validity of Enquiry Proceedings Despite Delay. The court held that the disciplinary authority's decision to impose penalty of dismissal was not vitiated by delay in framing charges or by the enquiry officer's failure to consider defence documents, as the employee had ample opportunity to participate.

17 Jun 2016

The appellant, Sri K. P. Narayanan Kutty, was an officer of the State Bank of India who joined service in 1964. While working as Branch Manager at Shi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)