Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2362 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2362 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Sale Agreement. Recital of Possession in Agreement Not Conclusive When Only 15% Consideration Paid; Refund Admissible Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 19 March 2020, by which the petitioners agreed to purchase a flat in Karad, Satara for a total cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Directing Expeditious VAT Refund Processing for Package Scheme Incentive Holder; Bank Guarantee Furnished Triggers One-Month Refund Obligation Under Section 51(5) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. Holder of Certificate of Entitlement Under Package Scheme of Incentives Entitled to Refund Within One Month of Furnishing Bank Guarantee, Subject to Verificatory Process Not Being Delayed Indefinitely.

9 Feb 2012

The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, and holder of an eligibility certificate under the Package Scheme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax Paid by Non-Resident Despite Revenue's Appeal — Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable. Service Tax Refund Ordered as Stay Application Dismissed and Tax Paid by Appellant Itself, Not Collected from Others.

11 Mar 2015

The appellant, M/s Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., a non-resident service provider, paid service tax under protest for the period 10.09.2004 to 31.12.2004. Af...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Part, Reducing Interest Rate on Refund for Delayed Possession of Row House. Buyer's Agreement's One-Sided Clause on Delay Interest Does Not Preclude Claim for Reasonable Compensation; Refund Upheld but Interest Reduced from 12% to 9%.

25 Mar 2019

The case involves a dispute between Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd (the developer/appellant) and Devasis Rudra (the buyer/respondent) arising...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Refund Claim Under CGST Act — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Excess Tax Paid Due to Inadvertent Double Filing of GST Returns. The court held that the rejection of the refund claim by the appellate authority was unsustainable and directed the respondents to process the refund within eight weeks, subject to verification of no unjust enrichment.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioner, an individual, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 28 December 2022 passed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.

25 Aug 2021

The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Customs Drawback with Interest — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- with 6% Interest Under Section 27A of Customs Act, 1962. Drawback Sanctioned but Withheld Due to Investigation; Court Holds Mere Pendency of Investigation Does Not Justify Withholding Payment and Rejects Limitation and Unjust Enrichment Defenses.

22 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Vina Ahuja, sole proprietor of Venus Designs, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking refund of customs drawback am...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Agreement to Purchase is Cancelled Due to Developer's Default. The court held that since no conveyance deed was executed and the agreement was cancelled due to developer's default, the petitioner is entitled to refund of stamp duty under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Satish Buba Shetty, a retired bank official, entered into an Agreement to Purchase a flat with M/s. Vijaykamal Properties Private Limi...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)