Search Results for "inter-se dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "inter-se dispute"

194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

High Court

High Court Frames Substantial Questions of Law in Second Appeal Involving Exclusive Right to Perform Puja in Privately Owned Temple. Appeal Raises Issues on Admissibility of Old Documents Under Section 90 of Indian Evidence Act and Bar of Suit Under Bombay Hindu Places of Public Worship Act, 1956.

17 Jul 2014

Background: The litigation arose from a dispute between two Hindu communities, the Badaves (plaintiffs) and the Lingayats (defendants), over the right...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Jul 2024

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.

21 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute Based on Will — Finds Appellate Court Erred in Reversing Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Non-Prosecution of Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the will was not duly proved under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the defendant's claim of adverse possession was not established.

11 Jun 2019

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.1, Shivram s/o Raghunath Barbole, challenging the judgment and decree dated 30-06-201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Injunction Against Trade Union Strike in Shipping Industry — Mere Apprehension of Strike Without Concrete Evidence Does Not Justify Injunction Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Court Held That Writ Petition Was Premature and Not Maintainable as There Was No Immediate Threat of Strike.

24 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Indian National Shipowners' Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking an injunction ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Co-owners Not Necessary Parties as They Claim Through Same Title as Defendants. The court held that under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, petitioners claiming to be co-owners are not necessary or proper parties to a suit for specific performance when they claim through the same title as existing defendants.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Natasha Dilip Singh and Dilip Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Properties Were Self-Acquired. Daughters Granted Equal 1/6th Share Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Father Died Intestate.

14 Jun 2024

The case involves a partition suit filed by three daughters (Plaintiffs) against their brother (Defendant No.1) and others, seeking a share in propert...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)