Search Results for "illegal recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "illegal recovery"

3193 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3193 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement and Back Wages in Panchayat Service Dispute — Recovery Application Maintainable Despite Employer's Challenge. The court dismissed the petition challenging the award and recovery order, finding no jurisdictional error or perversity in the Labour Court's findings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Shinor Taluka Panchayat, challenged the judgment and award dated 18.07.2017 passed by the Labour Court, Vadodara in Reference (LCV) No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

9 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pensionary Benefits Case — Advance Increment Recovery Set Aside. Recovery of Rs.67,918/- from pensionary benefits of a retired Lower Division Clerk quashed as recovery from a Class III employee after superannuation is impermissible under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Manohar Bappaji Gaikwad, was a Lower Division Clerk working with the Civil Court at Kallam, District Osmanabad. On 21.11.2006, he rece...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

No Limitation for Cooperative Society Dues: Bombay High Court Affirms Recovery from Flat Occupants under Section 154B-29 MCS Act

16 Jan 2026

The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging recovery certificates issued by a cooperative housing society for long-pending maintenance ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

20 Sep 2019

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

19 Aug 2021

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servant in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony suffered from material contradictions.

11 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dattatraya Bhagwan Omase, a public servant working as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

16 Aug 2017

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)