WRIT PETITION NO.872 OF 1994
12 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "grading"
131 result(s) found
Found 131 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of CHB Teacher Against University for Denial of Approval and Termination. University's failure to consider representation and termination without notice violates principles of natural justice and University Ordinances.
10 Feb 2025The Petitioner, Dr. Gaikwad Rajashri Nitin @ Rajashri Prataprao Mohite, was appointed as a Clock Hour Basis (CHB) teacher at Yashwantrao Chavan Vidyal...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Principal Qualification Dispute — Ph.D Not Mandatory Under AICTE Regulations. Court Holds That 2010 AICTE Regulations Provide Alternate Qualifications for Principal Post, and State Rules Providing for Appointment Without Ph.D Are Not Ultra Vires.
18 Feb 2020The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Chhattisgarh's order quashing promotions of seven appellants to the post of Principal i...
- 152
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.
1 Jan 2020The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...
- 250
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Selected Candidate in Assistant Professor Appointment Dispute — Equivalence of Diploma Determined by Expert Committee. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its judicial review by substituting its opinion on academic equivalence for that of the expert Selection Committee and the University's Equivalence Committee.
7 Aug 2019The appeal arose from a challenge to the appointment of Dr. Sridip Chatterjee as Assistant Professor in Physical Education (Yoga Therapy) at Jadavpur ...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.
29 Jul 2019The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Communication of APAR Entries. Failure to Disclose Annual Performance Appraisal Report Entries Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Law Laid Down in Dev Dutt and Sukhdev Singh.
10 Jul 2019The dispute arose from the appellant's claim for promotion from Scale III to Scale IV in United India Insurance Co Ltd for the year 2014-2015. The app...
- 315
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Challenge in Port Trust Service Matter — Adverse Remarks Must Be Communicated Before Being Considered for Promotion. Uncommunicated adverse remarks cannot be used to deny promotion to Assistant Traffic Manager under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
25 Mar 2013The petitioner, Manuel Lourenco D'Costa, was an employee of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao (respondent No.1). He was appointed as a Cle...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation Issues. Arbitrator's failure to provide hearing and rejection of limitation plea without reasons led to award being set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
23 Jan 2013The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 9 April 2012 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...
- 40
