Bombay High Court Allows Petition of CHB Teacher Against University for Denial of Approval and Termination. University's failure to consider representation and termination without notice violates principles of natural justice and University Ordinances.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Dr. Gaikwad Rajashri Nitin @ Rajashri Prataprao Mohite, was appointed as a Clock Hour Basis (CHB) teacher at Yashwantrao Chavan Vidyalaya, Pachwadi, Satara, run by Rayyat Sikshan Sanstha. She worked from the academic year 2017-2018 until January 2024. The Deputy Secretary Affiliation Department of Shivaji University, Kolhapur, passed an order dated 08/11/2023 denying approval to her appointment, citing non-compliance with University Ordinances. Consequently, the management terminated her services in February 2024 without any notice. The Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the impugned order, reinstatement with back wages, and condonation of break in service for continuity. The court observed that the University did not consider the Petitioner's representation before passing the order, and the termination was effected without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, directed the University to reconsider the approval after hearing the Petitioner, and directed the management to reinstate the Petitioner with continuity of service and condone the break period. The court also directed payment of unpaid salaries for the period worked.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Clock Hour Basis Teacher - Approval of Appointment - University Ordinances - Petitioner was appointed as a CHB teacher but University denied approval on grounds of non-compliance with Ordinances - Court held that the University failed to consider the Petitioner's representation and the termination was without notice, violating natural justice - Directed University to reconsider approval and condone break in service (Paras 1-10).

B) Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Termination without Notice - Petitioner's services were terminated without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing - Court held that such termination is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice - Directed reinstatement with continuity of service (Paras 5-10).

C) Service Law - Condonation of Break in Service - CHB Teacher - Petitioner sought condonation of break period in each academic year for continuity of service - Court directed University to condone the break and treat the Petitioner as continuous in service for all benefits (Paras 8-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 08/11/2023 passed by Respondent No.1 denying approval to the Petitioner's appointment as a Clock Hour Basis (CHB) teacher and the subsequent termination of her services are legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order dated 08/11/2023, directed the University to reconsider the approval after hearing the Petitioner, directed the management to reinstate the Petitioner with continuity of service and condone the break period, and directed payment of unpaid salaries for the period worked.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to be Heard
  • Approval of Appointment
  • Clock Hour Basis Teacher
  • University Ordinances
  • Termination without Notice
  • Condonation of Break in Service
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 216

WRIT PETITION NO. 3884 OF 2024

2025-02-10

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE

2024:BHC-AS:50998-DB

Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the Petitioner; Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar a/w. Ms. Sayali Gangal & Ms. Madhura Mulay for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Mr. Swapnil P. Kamble, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4; Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6

Shrimati Dr. Gaikwad Rajashri Nitin @ Rajashri Prataprao Mohite

The Deputy Secretary Affiliation Department, Shivaji University, Kolhapur; Shivaji University, Kolhapur; The Divisional Joint Director, (Higher Education), Kolhapur Region, Kolhapur; The State of Maharashtra; Rayyat Sikshan Sanstha, Satara; Yashwantrao Chavan Vidyalaya, Pachwadi, Satara

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the University denying approval to the appointment of the Petitioner as a Clock Hour Basis teacher and the subsequent termination of her services.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 08/11/2023, direction to grant approval to the appointment, reinstatement with back wages, and condonation of break in service for continuity.

Filing Reason

The Petitioner was appointed as a CHB teacher but the University denied approval, leading to her termination without notice.

Previous Decisions

The Deputy Secretary Affiliation Department passed an order dated 08/11/2023 denying approval to the Petitioner's appointment.

Issues

Whether the impugned order dated 08/11/2023 denying approval to the Petitioner's appointment is legal and valid. Whether the termination of the Petitioner's services without notice is violative of natural justice. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to reinstatement, back wages, and condonation of break in service.

Submissions/Arguments

The Petitioner argued that the University did not consider her representation before passing the impugned order and that the termination was without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing. The University contended that the appointment was not in compliance with the University Ordinances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the University's failure to consider the Petitioner's representation and the termination without notice violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the University was directed to reconsider the approval after affording an opportunity of hearing. The management was directed to reinstate the Petitioner with continuity of service and condone the break period.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave to add prayer clause. Addition be carried out forthwith. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (B), (B-1), (B-2) and (C)...

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the order dated 08/11/2023 passed by the Deputy Secretary Affiliation Department of Shivaji University, Kolhapur, denying approval to her appointment as a Clock Hour Basis teacher. The petition was heard on 10th February 2025 and allowed.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Lecturer's Appeal Against Compulsory Retirement Under Orissa Service Code; Single Adverse Entry Held Insufficient When Overall Record Was Good. Compulsory Retirement Based Solely on One Year's Adverse Remarks Was Arbitrary and No...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Witness Committed Perjury by Resiling from Previous Statement. The Court found that PW 22 Deepak Trivedi, an eye witness, resiled from his earlier statement re...