Search Results for "freight and insurance"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money — Defendant Granted Leave to Defend as Triable Issues Exist. The court set aside the decree and remanded the matter for trial, holding that the trial court erred in not granting leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(a) CPC.

This appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated January 25, 2010 in O.S. No. 15450/2005 passed by the XXVI Addl. City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods Sold. Arbitration Clause in Clearing and Forwarding Agency Agreement Not Attracted as Dispute Arose from Independent Sale Transactions, Not from the Agreement.

The appellant-defendant, T.A.I. Pharma Ltd., entered into a Clearing and Forwarding Agency Agreement dated 1st January 2007 with the respondent-plaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — Held that ITAT Correctly Deleted Addition for Non-Compete Fee Paid to AE Without Adequate Justification. The court found no substantial question of law as the Tribunal's findings were factual and not perverse.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows CENVAT Credit on GTA Service for Cement Manufacturer — Place of Removal Includes Buyer's Destination. Interpretation of 'Place of Removal' under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for outward transportation of goods sold on FOR destination basis.

The appellant, M/s. Madras Cements Limited, a manufacturer of cement, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Set Off of Unabsorbed Business Loss Against Profits of Erstwhile 10A Unit. Tribunal's Order Allowing Set Off of Brought Forward Loss of Assessment Year 2002-03 Against Profits of 10A Unit in Assessment Year 2005-06 Upheld.

The case involves two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, M...