Search Results for "fraudulent invoices"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "fraudulent invoices"

137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

"Reversal of Cenvat Credit Without Goods Entering Factory Premises Invalid: Bombay HC Upholds Recovery and Penalty" "Illegitimate Reversal of Cenvat Credit and Misrepresentation of Goods' Movement Constitutes Fraud"

14 Dec 2024

Acts and Sections Discussed: Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35G (Appeal to High Court), Section 11AC (Penalty for Excise Duty Evasion). Cenvat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

3 Sep 2024

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Chief Minister in Corruption Case Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Pre-Condition. Investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was invalid as prior approval under Section 17A was not obtained, rendering the FIR and remand order liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

16 Jan 2024

The dispute involved a former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh challenging criminal proceedings initiated against him by the State CID for alleged off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Petroleum Dealers Challenging VAT Assessment Orders. Assessment orders under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Value Added Tax Act, 2005 set aside as barred by limitation and violative of natural justice.

21 May 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several petroleum dealers (M/s. Yogi Petroleum, Jay Jalaram Construction Co., M/s. Ratan P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Injunction in Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Similarity of marks alone insufficient for interim relief when defendant has used its registered mark for nearly a decade without evidence of confusion.

15 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Wockhardt Ltd and Overseas African Remedie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

11 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

30 Apr 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Allowing Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Revisional Authority's finding that merchant exporter cannot be denied rebate for manufacturer's bogus Cenvat credit without evidence of collusion was upheld under Section 35EE of Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 Jun 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an o...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)