Search Results for "forcible sexual intercourse"

338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR in Breach of Promise to Marry Case — No Offence of Rape Made Out as Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual Based on Promise of Marriage. Court holds that failure to marry due to incompatibility does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC or cheating under Section 417 IPC.

The petitioners, including the main accused Bharat Devdan Salvi and his family members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 451, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Martand Ramchandra Lohkare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 451 (house-tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on a Deaf, Dumb, and Bedridden Minor Child under POCSO Act and IPC. Mother's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence of Rape and House Trespass.

The case involves the conviction of Mukesh son of Tulshiram Madavi for offences under Section 454 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father-in-Law for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor Daughter-in-Law. Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 376, 506(II) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Tukaram Pandurang Mhaske, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act for offences under Sections 376 and 506(II) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Affirms Conviction Upholds Justice Despite Previous Acquittals. Ensuring Justice Prevails: Court Upholds Conviction Despite Challenges, Highlights Significance of Victim Testimony

The respondents were convicted by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for an incident dating back to 1989. They were senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamlal s/o Punaram Achale, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial 139/2001 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...