Search Results for "exempt income"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Gift of Shares Without Consideration — Gift Does Not Constitute Income Escape Under the Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Jai Trust, a trust incorporated under the Indian Trust Act, 1882, challenged the legality and validity of a notice dated 12 March...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Mushroom Farming Income Held Agricultural. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in mushroom farming, filed its income tax return for assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Resident Company — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion is Impermissible; Notice and Order Rejecting Objections Set Aside.

The petitioner, Indivest Pte Ltd, a company incorporated in Singapore and wholly owned by the Government of Singapore, filed a writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case for Notified Person Under Special Court Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961 not chargeable due to assets being vested in Custodian.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the assessee, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...