Search Results for "excavation material"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "excavation material"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Article 227. Petitioners failed to establish exclusive ownership over suit property; findings of trial court and first appellate court upheld as per Section 100 CPC.

1 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Ganesh D Tapkir and Santosh Krushna Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgm...

High Court

Court Quashes Politically Motivated Detention Order Against Opposition Politician. Subjective Satisfaction and Proper Evidence Lacking; Petitioner to Be Released Forthwith

3 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Yogesh Udaram Gokhe, challenging a detention order passed by the respondents under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

28 Jun 2021

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dredging Contract Dispute — Interest Award Modified and Counterclaim Allowed. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's award of interest from the date of the award rather than from the date of the claim was contrary to Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the rejection of the employer's counterclaim for demobilization costs under Clause 73(1) was perverse.

15 May 2020

The judgment concerns two cross petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majority arbitral award arising...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows PIL Seeking Remedial Measures Against Illegal Sand Mining and Withdraws Environment Clearance for Non-Compliance. Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy and GSEIAA to Re-evaluate Clearance Under Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines.

18 Dec 2019

The Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Hig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting Order in Sand Ghat Auction — Review Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Divisional Commissioner's Order Quashed as Petitioner Was Not Afforded Opportunity of Hearing Before Adverse Decision.

18 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Raju Leeladhar Sawwalakhe, a businessman involved in sand excavation for about 20 years, participated in an auction of sand ghats cond...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)