Search Results for "entry fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "entry fee"

546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Paddy Land Reclamation Fee Dispute — Notification Exemption Applies Only to First 25 Cents, Not Entire Land. The Court held that the Government Notification dated 25th February 2021 exempting payment of reclamation fee for lands up to 25 cents under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 does not apply to lands exceeding 25 cents; the exemption is for the entire land only if it is within 25 cents.

15 Dec 2024

The case involves the interpretation of a Government Notification dated 25th February 2021 issued under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification in Lalbagh Entry Fee Collection Case — Violation of Transparency and Level Playing Field. Fresh Tender Directed with Revised Conditions to Ensure Fair Competition Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

16 May 2023

The petitioner, Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in manpower services and collection of en...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Entry Tax on Industrial Townships — Industrial Townships Can Be Treated as 'Local Area' Under Entry 52 List II. Inclusion of industrial townships in definition of 'local area' for entry tax is constitutionally valid and does not violate Article 243-Q.

4 Nov 2022

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the validity of entry tax levied on goods entering industrial townships under the Orissa E...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of CL-2 Excise Licences for Alleged Distance Violation. Held that Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 does not apply to shops existing before the 2002 amendment and that cancellation without proper notice violates natural justice.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — State-Owned Corporation Not Liable to Deduct Tax at Source on Excise Duty Paid to Government. Excise duty paid by a state-owned corporation to the State Government does not constitute 'income' or 'commission' under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and no TDS is required under Section 194H.

3 Mar 2017

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the learned Single Judge i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal is a memorandum of appeal, not an application, thus ad valorem fee applies.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order dated 28.08.2015 passed under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal from order under Section 34 is treated as appeal from decree, requiring ad valorem court fee on subject matter value.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant, Rishabhkumar Jejani, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 28.08.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Ordered to be Returned for Presentation to Proper Court Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the City Civil Court at Dindoshi lacked jurisdiction over immovable property situated in Kandivali, and the plaint must be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

10 Oct 2011

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant no. 4, Manju Narendra Gupta, challenging an order of the City Civil Cou...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)