KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "email filing"
774 result(s) found
Found 774 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.
1 Jan 2026The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...
- 267
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator. The Court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional fact and once prima facie satisfied, the court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Sep 2025The appellant, Mahindra Defence Systems Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order...
- 42
Tribunals
NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.
3 Jul 2025The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.
4 Mar 2025The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...
- 400
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.
21 Feb 2022The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Assessment Orders in MVAT and CST Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Assessment Orders Passed Without Considering Petitioner's Submissions and Without Granting Personal Hearing. The court held that the assessing officer must consider the assessee's response and grant a hearing before passing assessment orders, even if limitation is expiring.
30 Apr 2021The petitioner, Greatship (India) Ltd., a company engaged in providing specialized services to oil and gas exploration and production entities, filed ...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.
6 Sep 2019The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Trademark Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Business Activities in Mumbai Confer Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case that part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court, and the defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving that the leave was improperly granted.
12 Jul 2017The plaintiff, M/s Black Ticket Films, a registered partnership firm based in New Delhi, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against two defendants ...
- 82
Tribunals
NCLAT Chennai Allows Appeals by Resolution Professional Against Rejection of Fee Claims Under IBC. Held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot reduce or disallow fees fixed by the Committee of Creditors without valid reasons.
30 Nov -0001The present appeals were filed by Mr. Immaneni Eswara Rao, a Resolution Professional, against four separate orders passed by the National Company Law ...
- 120
